Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III
32 GB T-MobileSGH-T999
| Global Score | |
| 71.3 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-03-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Polycarbonate | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 200 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is much better than the Galaxy S III, with an 82.4 score against 71.3. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro's body is notably newer and a little bit thinner, but also notably heavier than Galaxy S III. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has the newer 11 version while Galaxy S III has Android 4.3 version, so it provides the user some extra features and performance enhancements.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a greater display pixels density and a really larger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III, because it has a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a much larger aperture and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy S III, because it has a 139% bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro costs a bit more than Galaxy S III, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.