Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-05-03 | 2021-05-26 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.69 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Brown, Gray, Pink, Red and White | Aurora Green, Chrome Silver, Graphite Gray and Nighttime Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A76 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Arm Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 830 hours standby time 22.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III, having a global score of 79.5 against 72.7. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G's body is a lot newer, but way heavier and a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy S III. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III has Android 4.3, so it provides you a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S III features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, although it has a much smaller screen, a just a little worse pixels number per inch in the screen and a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S III, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G takes better videos and photos than Galaxy S III, because it has a lot larger camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a much better resolution back facing camera and a lot larger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations. Samsung Galaxy S III has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S III also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 64 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy S III, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 5G is also cheaper, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.