Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Polycarbonate | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting an 85.3 score against 72.2. The iPhone 11 Pro Max body is a lot newer and just a little thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. IPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with Android 4.3 OS.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a more vivid screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better 1242 x 2688px resolution, a lot bigger display and a greater pixel density. IPhone 11 Pro Max has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a really superior hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU, a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a much better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with a way better 12 mega pixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 video quality.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an 89 percent greater battery capacity.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.