Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-10-23 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Polycarbonate | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro is way better than Galaxy S III AT&T, with a overall score of 92.8 against 72.2. IPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy S III AT&T counts with Android 4.3 operating system. IPhone 12 Pro's construction is much newer and thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is also a lot heavier.
The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a better screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a larger screen, a way higher 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a better pixels count per screen inch. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 112 GB more internal storage capacity.
The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM, a larger number of faster cores and a 64-bit CPU. The iPhone 12 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much more MP back camera, a much bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and a much better (4K) video quality.
The iPhone 12 Pro has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 2815mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 12 Pro is way more expensive than Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.