Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | iOS 15.x |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-09-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Polycarbonate | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is way better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's design is notably newer and somewhat thinner, but noticeably heavier than Galaxy S III AT&T. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy S III AT&T comes with Android 4.3 OS.
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a much greater performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores, more RAM and a 64 bits CPU. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot bigger screen, a higher pixel quantity per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1284 x 2778px.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a much better video definition and a much larger aperture. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is way more expensive than the Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.