Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-11-19 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has an overall score of 87.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. Google Pixel 4a 5G's design is newer and just a little thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it's incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, providing some nice extra features and a performance increase.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 4 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a screen that's very similar to Galaxy S III AT&T's screen, although the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a bigger screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a higher pixel number in each inch of screen.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much larger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a lot higher 12.2 mega pixels resolution, a lot higher (4K) video resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor. Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an 85% greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.