Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T
SGH-I747| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet is a lot better than Galaxy S III AT&T, with an 87.1 score against 72.2. LG Velvet's body is notably newer and just a bit thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it's also much heavier. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a bit better looking display than LG Velvet, although it has a lot smaller screen, a bit lower pixels density and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels.
The LG Velvet features a faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 6 more cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG Velvet takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way better 3840x2160 video definition, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos, a way higher resolution camera in the back and a much larger aperture.
The LG Velvet counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The LG Velvet features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The LG Velvet not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.