Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-08-19 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 20 Pro is way better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, with a general score of 92.8 against 72.2. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 20 Pro has the newer 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's body is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it is noticeably heavier.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a better hardware performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T count with incredibly similar displays, although the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a really larger display and a higher pixels density.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way more mega-pixels back facing camera, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.