Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2022-08-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Mineral Gray |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge (2022) is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having an 84.7 score against 72.2. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge (2022) has a newer 12 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, providing a lot of extra features. The Motorola Edge (2022) body is much newer and a little thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is notably heavier.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more CPU cores and more RAM. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Edge (2022), although it has a little bit lower display pixels density, a lot smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720px.
Motorola Edge (2022) has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge (2022) shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger diafragm aperture, a camera with much more megapixels and a way higher video resolution.
Motorola Edge (2022) counts with a really longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138 percent larger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Edge (2022) is also cheaper than the Galaxy S III AT&T, which makes it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.