Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a general score of 78.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. These devices include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a newer 12 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, offering some extra features. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion design is much newer and somewhat thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T.
Galaxy S III AT&T has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a lot bigger screen and a greater number of pixels per display inch.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a superior battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 110% bigger battery size.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion captures much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, a much bigger diafragm aperture, a much more megapixels back camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.