Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting an 83.1 score against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Neo has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, providing you some extra features and increased performance. Although the Motorola Edge 30 Neo is somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a little bit thinner and noticeably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, although it has a lot lower quantity of pixels in each inch in the screen, a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720px and a really smaller screen. Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels, a way larger aperture to take better low light photography and better video frame rate.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a way better battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4020mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.