Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 13 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Interstellar Black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a score of 83.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it gives a couple additional features. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's a lot heavier.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way larger screen, a greater screen density and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has 10 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way more MP back facing camera, a way larger aperture for better low light photography, a much larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a superior battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 119% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.