Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, with a overall score of 81.9 against 72.2. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a notably newer and just a little bit thinner phone than Galaxy S III AT&T, but it is also heavier. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, counting with some additional features and optimized performance.
Galaxy S III AT&T has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less RAM memory and 6 lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better looking display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better resolution of 1256 x 2760, a much larger screen and a way higher pixels count per inch of screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot larger camera aperture, a camera in the back with a way better resolution, a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot bigger back camera sensor. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.