Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 4.73 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Red and White | Interstellar Black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a general score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's general score of 72.2. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, providing you a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) is a way thinner and much lighter cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), because although it has less RAM memory and less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra GPU. The Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit sharper display than Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024), although it has a lot worse 1280 x 720 resolution, a bit inferior pixel count per inch in the display and a way smaller screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better video quality and a lot higher 50 MP resolution back camera. The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) features a superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Plus (2024) has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 119 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.