Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, getting an 86.3 score against 72.2. These phones work with Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a newer 14 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version. Motorola Edge 50 Pro's construction is much newer and just a little thinner, but much heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a better screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a greater display pixels density, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a much bigger display.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro has much more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much higher (4K) video quality, a way more mega-pixels camera, a way bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.