Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a lot better than Galaxy S III AT&T, getting an 87.1 score against 72.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it provides you a couple nice extra features. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a way heavier cellphone than Galaxy S III AT&T, but they are 0.34inches thick.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a better display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a higher pixel density, a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a way bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has 6 less CPU cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot better video resolution, a back camera with way more megapixels, a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way larger aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 114 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.