Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G has a general score of 81.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 global score. The Moto G 5G design is way newer, but noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker than the Galaxy S III AT&T. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but Moto G 5G has the newer 10 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, giving you some extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a little bit worse pixels count in each screen inch, a much smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels. Motorola Moto G 5G counts with much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and 48 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a bit superior processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low-light environments, a much higher video definition and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.