Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Surfing blue |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having a overall score of 82.6 against 72.2. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus construction is newer than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is heavier and a bit thicker. Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G Plus, although it has a much smaller display, a lot worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a lot lesser pixels per inch in the display.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 48 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G Plus has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138% bigger battery size. The Moto G 5G Plus features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger diafragm aperture, a lot higher video definition, a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a way larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.