Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Smoke black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Power is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, having a 76.1 score against 72.2. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G Power has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it gives some additional features and performance improvements. Motorola Moto G Power's body is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it's thicker and a lot heavier.
Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Power, although it has a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720px, a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the display and a much smaller display. Motorola Moto G Power counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto G Power counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 48 GB more internal memory. Moto G Power takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much higher video resolution, a larger camera sensor providing a better image quality, a much bigger camera aperture and a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Moto G Power features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G Power is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.