Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aurora black and Aurora white |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 SM6150-AC chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus (2021) is slightly better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, with a 79.3 score against 72.2. Moto G Stylus (2021)'s body is way newer than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it's a little bit thicker and notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a little bit better display than Moto G Stylus (2021), although it has a quite inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, a really smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720.
Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 112 GB more internal memory. The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Moto G Stylus (2021) counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh. Moto G Stylus (2021) features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher resolution camera in the back, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments.
Moto G Stylus (2021) not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.