Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-06-14 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.67 x 3.05 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.67 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cosmic Emerald |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a general score of 82.1 against 72.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a newer 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3. Even though the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) is extremely newer than Galaxy S III AT&T, it is a little thicker and a lot heavier.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus 5G (2021), although it has a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720, a little bit less pixels per display inch and a really smaller display.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) shoots a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) also has a much bigger camera aperture and a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2021) not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.