Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 13 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2023-06-02 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cosmic Black and Rose Champagne |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 SM6450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 600 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has a general score of 76, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's general score of 72.2. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) is a noticeably newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's heavier and just a little thicker. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (operating system), but the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) has the newer 13 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it provides you some additional features.
Galaxy S III AT&T features just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), although it has a really smaller display, a way lower 1280 x 720px resolution and a little bit less pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy S III AT&T has a lot better performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023), because although it has lesser RAM and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor taking less light and duller colors, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way larger aperture to take better low-light captures and a way better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.