Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G71 5G is better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having an 82.9 score against 72.2. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G71 5G has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, giving a couple additional features. Moto G71 5G's body is newer and just a bit thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit sharper display than Moto G71 5G, although it has much lesser pixels per inch in the display, a much smaller screen and a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution. Moto G71 5G features a bit faster processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
The Moto G71 5G takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G71 5G also has a much bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light environments, a way higher resolution back-facing camera and better video frame rates.
Moto G71 5G has a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity. Moto G71 5G features a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.