Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G8 Power is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, with a score of 76 against 72.2. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the Moto G8 Power has a more recent 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it offers a couple additional features and improved performance. Moto G8 Power's construction is a lot newer, but thicker and much heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G8 Power, although it has a just a bit lower pixels density, a much lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a way smaller screen. Motorola Moto G8 Power counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G8 Power has a better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much more mega-pixels back camera, a much better video resolution, a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and a bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. The Moto G8 Power has a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage.
Motorola Moto G8 Power has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Moto G8 Power is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.