Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-09-07 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Moto G9 Plus is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a general score of 80.5 against 72.2. The Moto G9 Plus design is extremely newer, but extremely heavier and somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. These phones include Android OS, but Moto G9 Plus has 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, providing lots of additional features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy S III AT&T has a slightly better looking display than Moto G9 Plus, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the screen, a much lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen. Moto G9 Plus has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores (and faster).
Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 112 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G9 Plus counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138 percent greater battery size.
The Moto G9 Plus takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot more MP back camera, a way bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.