Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-12-05 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G9 Power is just a bit better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, with a 78.6 score against 72.2. Motorola Moto G9 Power's body is way newer, but thicker and notably heavier than Galaxy S III AT&T. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G9 Power has a newer 10 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a more vivid display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit lower 1280 x 720px resolution and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixels density. The Motorola Moto G9 Power has just a bit better processing power than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Moto G9 Power counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Moto G9 Power also has a way bigger aperture for better low-light images and video, faster video frame rate and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Motorola Moto G9 Power counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Moto G9 Power has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.