Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-09-05 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One Zoom has a global score of 80, which is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. Although the Motorola One Zoom is noticeably newer than Galaxy S III AT&T, it is just a bit thicker and incredibly heavier. The Motorola One Zoom counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 more processing cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S III AT&T has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Zoom, although it has a just a little worse pixel number per inch of screen, a way smaller screen and a way lower 1280 x 720 pixels resolution. The Motorola One Zoom features a much better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger sensor shooting lot better quality photographs, a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution camera, a lot better (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture to capture better photography and video in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola One Zoom has much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 128 GB and 128 GB internal memory. The Motorola One Zoom has a very superior battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 90 percent more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Motorola One Zoom is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.