Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-10-02 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, having an 87 score against 72.2. Although the Motorola razr (2020) is extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a little thinner and also extremely newer. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2020) has a more recent 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it gives some nice extra features and some performance improvements.
Galaxy S III AT&T has just a bit better screen than Motorola razr (2020), although it has a much smaller display, a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720px and a just a little worse pixels density. Motorola razr (2020) features a better processing power than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) shoots way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a back camera with a way better 48 mega pixels resolution, a lot better (4K) video quality, a way bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and videos and a lot larger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a way better battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 2800mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Motorola razr (2020) is way more expensive than the Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.