Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 15 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 306 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a general score of 79.2, which is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has newer 15 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version. Even though Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is way heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it's way thinner and also incredibly newer.
The Galaxy S III AT&T has a lot better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better video resolution, a way larger aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 124% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.