Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-03-03 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Blue |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a overall score of 76.4 against 72.2. Nokia 9 PureView's body is notably newer and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is noticeably heavier. The Nokia 9 PureView features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution, a bigger display and a much better amount of pixels per inch in the screen. Nokia 9 PureView has a superior memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Nokia 9 PureView has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way larger aperture for better images in low-light situations, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot better (4K) video quality.
The Nokia 9 PureView features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 3320mAh battery size.
The Nokia 9 PureView costs more money than Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.