Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Cyber shade |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a general score of 75.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 general score. The nubia Red Magic 3S construction is extremely newer, but heavier and somewhat thicker than Galaxy S III AT&T. These phones use Android operating system, but the nubia Red Magic 3S has newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it offers a lot of extra features and a performance increase.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, although it has a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720, a way smaller screen and a quite worse number of pixels per inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a faster processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs, a much bigger aperture to capture better photography in poorly lited situations, a lot more mega pixels back camera and a lot higher video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S costs a bit more money than the Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.