Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Sonic silver |
| Polycarbonate | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S is just a bit better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having a global score of 76.2 against 72.2. The nubia Red Magic 5S construction is much newer than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it's noticeably heavier and thicker. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the nubia Red Magic 5S has the newer 10 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a superior CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores (and also faster). The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a greater display density and a really larger screen.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a very superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S captures a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels, a way bigger aperture, a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition and a much larger sensor which gives a much better image and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
The nubia Red Magic 5S is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.