Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-21 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Neo is a bit better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having a 77.7 score against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but OPPO Find X2 Neo has 10 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it provides you some nice extra features. OPPO Find X2 Neo's design is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it's also incredibly heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Neo features a better processing unit than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a higher pixels density and a much bigger display.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much better battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4025mAh battery size.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher video quality, a much bigger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a camera with a much better 48 MP resolution and a way bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.