Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Ocean |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 Pro is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, having a global score of 83.1 against 72.2. Even though the OPPO Find X2 Pro is way newer than Galaxy S III AT&T, it is a lot heavier and a little thicker. These phones come with Android OS, but OPPO Find X2 Pro has the newer 10 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, providing you a lot of extra features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a really bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px and a much higher count of pixels per inch of screen. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 10 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images and videos, a much better (4K) video resolution, a camera with way more MP and a lot larger camera sensor.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4260mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.