Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | -- |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a general score of 77, which is a bit better than Galaxy S III AT&T's overall score of 72.2. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G design is incredibly heavier but thinner than Galaxy S III AT&T. Both devices we compare here include Android OS, but the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it offers a lot of extra features.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger display, a much higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a higher pixels density. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a faster CPU than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 10 GB more RAM.
OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way higher (4K) video definition, a lot better resolution back camera and a much bigger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.