Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2023-12-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A15 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, with a 77.4 score against 72.2. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A15 5G has a newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version. Galaxy A15 5G is a noticeably newer and just a little thinner device than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's also a lot heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU. The Galaxy A15 5G has a bit sharper display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a really bigger display, a better count of pixels per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a way bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage. Galaxy A15 5G counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy A15 5G is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.