Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-07-02 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 has a score of 76.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 global score. Galaxy A22's design is extremely newer and just a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy A22 has newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version.
The Galaxy A22 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S III AT&T features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22, because although it has a bit lower 1280 x 720px resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A22 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A22 also has a much higher 48 megapixels resolution camera and a lot larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S III AT&T features a really longer battery life than Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.