Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-06-24 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 score. Even though Galaxy A22 5G is a lot newer than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it is much heavier and a little thicker. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A22 5G has the newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and performance tweaks.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a little better performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, although it has a way smaller display, a lot lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a just a little worse display pixels density.
Galaxy A22 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A22 5G has a greater camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a way more MP back camera and a way larger aperture for better images and video in low light situations.
Galaxy A22 5G counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.