Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is much better than the Galaxy S III AT&T, with a 79.9 score against 72.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has newer 14 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, offering some additional features. Even though Galaxy A25 5G is notably heavier than the Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a bit thinner and also notably newer.
The Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a much more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and 6 less processing cores , it also counts with a graphics processor. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a greater pixels density, a way larger display and a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much larger aperture for better low light captures and videos, a way more mega-pixels back camera, a much better video quality and a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos. Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.