Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 14 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2024-03-11 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A35 5G is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T, with a 79.4 score against 72.2. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS, but Galaxy A35 5G has newer 14 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, so it provides the user a couple additional features and a performance increase. Galaxy A35 5G's construction is a lot newer and just a bit thinner than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it is a lot heavier.
Galaxy S III AT&T features a much better performing processor than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a greater count of pixels per screen inch, a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a much better (4K) video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a lot larger aperture for better low light images and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.