Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-10-20 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, with a score of 86.6 against 72.2. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A50s has newer 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, providing the user some extra features. Although the Samsung Galaxy A50s is somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it's thinner and also notably newer.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A50s, although it has a really smaller screen, a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display. The Galaxy A50s counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 112 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy A50s counts with a better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores. The Galaxy A50s features a much better camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much bigger aperture, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution, a much larger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.