Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a 90.7 score against 72.2. The Samsung Galaxy A52 construction is a lot newer and a little thinner, but also notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. Galaxy A52 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, although it has a much smaller screen, a little bit worse display density and a way lower 1280 x 720 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A52 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a much larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality and a way bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video.
The Galaxy A52 has a way better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.