Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a 91.3 score against 72.2. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version and Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, offering a couple nice extra features. Galaxy A52 5G's design is way newer and just a little bit thinner, but noticeably heavier than Galaxy S III AT&T.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more cores and a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S III AT&T features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a just a little lower pixel density, a way smaller screen and a lot lower 1280 x 720 resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much larger sensor taking way higher quality pictures, a much higher video definition, a way more MP back camera and a way bigger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 112 GB more internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.