Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-09-01 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s has a general score of 91.1, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's score of 72.2. Samsung Galaxy A52s's design is newer and just a little bit thinner, but heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T. These devices use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3.
The Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, although it has a lot worse 1280 x 720px resolution, a really smaller screen and a little less pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 112 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s features a more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy A52s captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger sensor, a lot larger aperture for better low-light images and videos, a much better video resolution and a camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A52s counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 114 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.