Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A70 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, with a overall score of 76.9 against 72.2. Although the Galaxy A70 is much heavier than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, it's a little thinner and also extremely newer. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A70 has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3 version, counting with some nice extra features.
Galaxy A70 counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 6 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit better screen than Galaxy A70, although it has a lot worse 1280 x 720 resolution, a just a bit lower pixels quantity in each inch of display and a much smaller display.
Galaxy A70 features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 114% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller back camera sensor and a way smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rates.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A70 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.