Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Prism bricks black |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, with a global score of 92.9 against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A71 5G UW has a newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, giving a lot of extra features. The Galaxy A71 5G UW construction is newer and just a bit thinner, but incredibly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a faster processing unit than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more RAM and 6 more cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, although it has a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution, a just a bit worse screen pixels density and a much smaller screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited environments, a much better 3840x2160 video quality, a way higher 64 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a way bigger sensor.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 112 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a little more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.