Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 12 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2022-03-22 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Red and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 306 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.47 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F23 has a score of 84.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 global score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, providing you a couple nice extra features and optimized performance. The Samsung Galaxy F23 design is notably newer, a bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T.
The Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy F23, although it has a much lower resolution of 1280 x 720, a just a little worse screen pixel density and a way smaller screen. The Galaxy F23 counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 6 more processing cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy F23 shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments and a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy F23 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 138% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.