Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 11 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Polycarbonate | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 585.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.47 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 is a lot better than Galaxy S III AT&T, getting a global score of 88.1 against 72.2. Both devices in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Galaxy S III AT&T has Android 4.3, so it provides you a lot of extra features and increased performance. Galaxy F62's construction is way newer than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it is a bit thicker and noticeably heavier.
Galaxy F62 has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores (and faster) and 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy F62 counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a much bigger display and more pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a greater camera than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality, a much larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video, a lot higher video definition and a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.