Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Polycarbonate | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 306 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, having a 90.8 score against 72.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 20's construction is way newer and a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T's, but it is also heavier. Galaxy Note 20 features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T features a slightly better screen than Galaxy Note 20, although it has a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720, a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch of screen and a much smaller display. Galaxy Note 20 captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a lot higher resolution camera in the back, a much bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much better quality photos.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 112 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 105 percent larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 costs a lot more money than Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.