Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4.0.4 | -- |
| 2012-06-04 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.38 x 2.78 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 585.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 306 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.60 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 199 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a lot better than Galaxy S III AT&T's 72.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note10's construction is way newer and just a little thinner than the Galaxy S III AT&T's, although it is somewhat heavier. Galaxy S III AT&T features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10, although it has a much smaller screen, a lot worse resolution of 1280 x 720 and a little bit less pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy Note10 has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a greater performance than Galaxy S III AT&T, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity against 2100mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 captures greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S III AT&T, because it has a much bigger camera aperture for better photos and video in low light environments, a bigger sensor, a lot higher 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot higher video quality.
Galaxy Note10 costs a lot more than the Galaxy S III AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.